Home/Coyote & Predator Hunting/Bullet Terminal Ballistics

Bullet Terminal Ballistics

Shot CraftLevel 2 — Intermediate

What It Is

Bullet terminal ballistics is the understanding of what happens from the moment a projectile contacts an animal through to the moment it stops — including expansion, fragmentation, wound channel geometry, energy transfer, and animal anchoring. For predator hunters, this knowledge determines which bullets produce instant anchor (hydrostatic shock) vs. runners, how bullet weight and design affect fur damage when pelt-saving matters, and why thermal hunting requires different bullet selection than daytime shooting due to reduced shot precision.

Correct Execution

  • Hydrostatic shock is the primary mechanism for instant anchor in predator hunting — achieved through high velocity (3,500–4,000 fps) light expanding bullets (40–55 grain) impacting the vitals, causing hydraulic pressure wave that disrupts the central nervous system
  • Bullet that stays inside the animal is often superior to a pass-through: retained bullet transfers all energy into wound channel, causing rapid internal hemorrhage; coyotes bleed out fast — a midbody hit with retained bullet can be as lethal as a shoulder-placement hit if bullet doesn't exit
  • Pass-through shots lose kinetic energy to the backstop, reducing wound channel severity; important when using heavier/faster bullets designed for range rather than terminal performance
  • Fur damage is fundamentally a function of shot placement + bullet construction, not bullet weight alone — any bullet will blow a coyote up if hit in the wrong place; a small-caliber expanding bullet on a precise shoulder shot causes less fur damage than a heavy bullet mid-body
  • Thermal hunting imposes a shot precision penalty — thermal reticles are less precise than daylight crosshairs; the halo of a thermal image makes it easy to believe you're on the shoulder when you're actually 3–4 inches back; this argues for a more destructive, energy-retaining bullet selection at night
  • Heavier bullets: more downrange energy (important at 400+ yards), better wind resistance, higher BC — but more internal damage and more likelihood of a massive exit wound if going fast enough; tradeoff between range capability and fur preservation
  • The 53-grain V-Max (.224) is a specific callout from experienced hunters as the sweet spot for daytime coyote shooting: precise shot placement is possible in daylight, the bullet fragments dramatically on impact causing instant anchor, and it stays inside the animal on typical body shots

Progression Levels

Diagnostic Tree

Coaching Cues

  • "Hydrostatic shock — lock them up, tip them over, done. That's what we're looking for on camera." — O'Neill Ops Podcast 22 (2022-04-08)
  • "The 22-250 does everything the 223 does, but it does it better — except mag capacity in AR platform." — O'Neill Ops Podcast 22 (2022-04-08)
  • "53-grain V-Max out of the 223: if you hit him right, they don't go anywhere. That bullet is precise enough for shoulder shots in the daytime." — Geoff Nemnich, How to Call More Coyotes (2025-03-03)
  • "Keep the bullet inside. Mass damage inside, bleeds out fast. Pass-through, you're tracking." — Geoff Nemnich, How to Call More Coyotes (2025-03-03)
  • "Any bullet will blow a coyote up in the wrong spot. Shot placement is always the first variable." — O'Neill Ops Podcast 22 (2022-04-08)
  • "Heavier bullet going just as fast equals more damage — automatic. You can't get around physics." — O'Neill Ops Podcast 22 (2022-04-08)
  • "The ELD-VT is nasty. It's not just the bullet — the fragmentation and wound channels are unreal." — Geoff Nemnich, How to Call More Coyotes (2025-03-03)

Common Errors

  1. Attributing all runners to shot placement: Poor bullet design causes runners even from well-placed shots. A match bullet or FMJ on a shoulder shot will not produce hydrostatic shock and will produce a runner in cases where a V-Max would drop the animal. → Separate bullet performance from shot placement in post-hunt analysis.

  2. Using the same bullet for all ranges: Frangible light bullets (50 grain V-Max) lose terminal performance rapidly past 250–300 yards as velocity drops below expansion threshold. Heavy match bullets perform well at 400+ yards but over-penetrate at close range. → Select bullet for most common engagement distance; carry a second load if range varies widely.

  3. Selecting "pelt-saving" bullets and getting more runners: Bullets marketed for fur preservation are often heavier with less frangibility; they produce less hydrostatic shock and more pass-throughs. Unrecovered runners ruin far more pelts than any bullet choice on recovered animals. → Anchor the animal first; shot placement on a dead coyote causes zero additional fur damage.

  4. Not adjusting bullet selection for thermal vs. daytime hunting: Daytime precision with a scope allows exact shoulder/neck placement where light fast bullets are optimal. Thermal precision is reduced — a bullet that depends on perfect placement to work will fail at night when placement drifts. → Separate thermal and daytime loads; thermal loads should be more forgiving on imprecise placement.

  5. Reloading for accuracy without testing terminal performance: A 1/4-MOA load is wasted if the bullet design is wrong for predator applications. Internal accuracy work (seating depth, neck tension, charge weight) improves group size but doesn't fix a bullet that punches through without anchoring. → Test terminal performance independently from accuracy testing.

Edges

Conventional Wisdom Is Wrong

Pelt-Saving Bullets Ruin More Pelts Than Expanding Bullets

Bullets marketed for fur preservation are typically heavier and less frangible, producing fewer runners — but they also produce more pass-throughs, which means less hydrostatic shock and more coyotes running 100+ yards before expiring. An unrecovered runner is a 100% pelt loss. The math favors a clean-killing expanding bullet every time.

What most people do
Select heavier, "fur-safe" bullets to preserve pelt value, accepting occasional runners as the tradeoff.
What the best do
Prioritize anchor reliability with expanding/frangible bullets (V-Max, ELD-VT) that dump energy inside the animal; a pelt on a recovered coyote with a chest wound is still sellable — a pelt on an unrecovered runner is worthless.
Why it's an edge: The conservation that "pelt-saving bullets" produces is illusory if the bullet's reduced terminal performance increases runner rate — and runner rate is a larger pelt loss than any entry wound.
How to exploit: Switch to 53-grain V-Max or ELD-VT for daytime calling. Track recovery rate across a season. The recovery rate improvement will exceed any pelt-damage increase from expanding bullets on well-placed shots.
O'Neill Ops Podcast 22 (2022-04-08) — "Any bullet will blow a coyote up in the wrong spot. Shot placement is always the first variable. A V-Max on a perfect shoulder shot does less damage than a 'pelt-saving' bullet in the guts."
💎 Elite-Only Behavior

Thermal Scope Demands a Different Bullet

The thermal image halo creates a 2-4 inch uncertainty radius around the animal's body at typical calling distances; shots that feel like shoulder placements are often mid-body. A bullet that depends on precise shoulder placement for clean kills (light, fast, frangible) will produce a runner rate at night that the same bullet never produces by day. The correct response is caliber or bullet change, not better aim.

What most people do
Run the same load day and night, attributing higher night runner rates to lower visibility rather than bullet-performance mismatch.
What the best do
Maintain separate day and night rigs or loads — daytime precision allows 53-grain V-Max at shoulder; thermal imprecision demands a larger caliber (22 ARC, 6 ARC, 6.5 Creedmoor) or more destructive bullet that works on imprecise placement.
Why it's an edge: Night runner rate is a solvable problem through equipment, not skill. Most hunters try to improve thermal shooting technique; experts recognize it's a physics problem and fix it with a different bullet.
How to exploit: Compare day and night runner rates over 20+ kills. If night runner rate is >2x day runner rate, the bullet is wrong for thermal use — not the shooter. Move up in caliber or bullet mass.
Geoff Nemnich, How to Call More Coyotes (2025-03-03) — moved from 22-250 to 22 ARC for thermal specifically to compensate for precision penalty; runs 95-grain V-Max in 6.5 Creedmoor.

Sources

  • O'Neill Ops Podcast 22: Cartridge Selection — 22-250 (2022-04-08, James O'Neill) — primary source for hydrostatic shock philosophy, 22-250 vs. 223 vs. 22 Creedmoor tradeoffs, bullet weight vs. fur damage, heavier bullet for range, fast-twist barrel allowing heavy bullets, V-Max performance, inherently accurate cartridge selection
  • Geoff Nemnich, How to Call More Coyotes (2025-03-03) — thermal hunting bullet selection (larger calibers for precision penalty), retained bullet vs. pass-through principle, 53-grain V-Max precision for daytime, 6.5 Creedmoor 95-grain V-Max for thermal, ELD-VT performance, callable coyote context
  • Les Johnson / Burris Predator Quest Scopes (2016-11-04) — scope-rifle system context for shot accuracy that enables bullet selection to matter